|
Student Observation Sheet and Rubric |
|
Observations |
|
|
Notes | ||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
|
|
Student Observation Rubric |
|
Attributes |
Above Standard |
At Standard |
Attribute Still A Goal |
Attribute Points Earned |
|
Points Possible |
(5-4.5) |
(4.0-3.5) |
(3.0-0) |
|
|
Measurements |
Consistently made careful measurements taking time to see that the measurements made sense. |
Usually made careful measurements taking time to see that the measurements made sense. |
Consistently made measurements without care or reflection. |
/5 |
|
Use of Class Time |
Came to class prepared and equipped; made effective use of time; were always on task and actively involved in the project. |
Usually came to class prepared and equipped; usually made effective use of time; were usually on task and actively involved in the project. |
Came to class unprepared a majority of the time, not using time effectively or staying on task. |
/5 |
|
Journal |
Kept up-to-date, organized, and labeled journal of all measurements, observations, questions, contacts, and progress. Organizatin and reflection are evident. |
Kept up-to-date, organized, and labeled journal of all measurements, observations, questions, contacts, and progress. |
Journal is incomplete or missing. |
/5 |
|
Project Sustainment |
Sustained the project with virtually no intervention from teacher; utilized problem-solving skills to implement the technology. |
Sustained the project with some intervention from teacher; utilized problem-solving skills to implement the technology. |
Project was not sustained or was sustained with considerable help from the teacher. |
/5 |
|
Team Work |
Consistently worked together as a well-coordinated team; divided large task into a number of smaller tasks; smaller tasks were assigned to team members; team members pulled their own share. |
Usually worked together as a well-coordinated team; usually divided large task into a number of smaller tasks; smaller tasks were usually assigned to team members; team members pulled their own share. |
Team did not work together and effectively split up tasks. Outside intervention was needed to help split up work; team members did not pull their own share. |
/5 |
|
Communication and Leadership |
Project leader was assigned; effectiveness of his/her role was clearly evident by the level of communication and coordination with each other and the teacher. |
Project leader was assigned; effectiveness of his/her role was usually evident by the level of communication and coordination with each other and the teacher. |
Project leader was not assigned or was not effective as evidenced by the lack of communication and coordination. |
/5 |
|
Observation Point Total |
/30 |
Student Observation Rubric
Glenbrook South High School Physics Page