(Submitted at ::date::)

LInC ACT Project Journal Rubric

Project Name: ::pname::

Project Authors: ::authors::

Evaluator: ::evalname::

Author/reviser e-mail addresses (one per line):

::authmail::

Evaluator e-mail addresses (one per line):

::evalmail::

::el1:: ::el2:: ::el3:: ::el4:: ::el5:: ::el6::
Criteria
3
2
1
0
An entry is written for each day the project is implemented.
3 = Entries are written for each day the project is implemented.
2 = Entries are written for at least 2/3 of the days the project is implemented.
1 = Entries are written for at least 1/3 of the days the project is implemented.
0 = Entries are written for less than 1/3 of the days the project is implemented.
Reflections share successes and challenges encountered implementing the project.
3 = Students' successes and failures are discussed and details are provided. Facilitator relates how these successes and failures have affected the implementation of the project and how she addressed these issues.
2 = Student successes and failures are discussed and details are provided.
1 = Student successes and/or failures are mentioned, but not discussed; no details are provided.
0 = Student successes or failures are not discussed.
Journal entries reflect prompts.
3 = Journal entries reflect the prompts.
0 = Journal entries do not reflect the prompts.
Journal entries document changes you plan to make when you implement the project a second time.
3 = Journal entries specifically document the changes you plan to make and a rationale for the change.
2 = Journal entries specifically document the changes you plan to make.
1 = Journal entries document the changes you plan to make but lack detail.
0 = Journal entries do not document the changes you plan to make.
Reflections demonstrate knowledge of engaged learning through examples and/or anecdotes.
3 = Reflections include anecdotes or examples that demonstrate the indicators of engaged learning in the project.
2 = Reflections include anecdotes or examples that mention the indicators of engaged learning but do not provide examples of them within the project.
0 = Reflections do not include the indicators of engaged learning.
Reflections demonstrate knowledge of Best Use of Technology through examples and/or anecdotes.
3 = Reflections include anecdotes or examples that demonstrate the indicators of Best Use of Technology in the project.
2 = Reflections include anecdotes or examples that mention the indicators of Best Use of Technology, but do not provide examples of them within the project.
0 = Reflections do not include the indicators of Best Use of Technology.

Comments:

::comments::

Total Score:

::total::

Authors: LInC ACT 2005 class
Created: October 2005 - Updated: December 2005
URL: http://www-ed.fnal.gov/lincon/act/rubrics/journal_ret.shtml