LInC ACT Project Journal Rubric

Project Name:

Project Authors:

Evaluator:

Author/Reviser E-mail Addresses (one per line):

Evaluator E-mail Addresses (one per line):

Criteria
3
2
1
0
An entry is written for each of the days of journal reflection questions.
3 = Entries are written for 5 or 6 of the days of the journal reflection questions.
2 = Entries are written for 3 or 4 of the days of the journal reflection questions.
1 = Entries are written for 1 or 2 of the days of the journal reflection questions.
0 = Entries are written for none of the days of journal reflection questions.
Reflections share successes and challenges encountered implementing the project.
3 = Student successes and failures are discussed and details are provided. Facilitator relates how these successes and failures have affected the implementation of the project and how she addressed these issues.
2 = Student successes and failures are discussed and details are provided.
1 = Student successes and/or failures are mentioned, but not discussed; no details are provided.
0 = Student successes or failures are not discussed.
Journal entries reflect prompts.
3 = Journal entries reflect the prompts.
0 = Journal entries do not reflect the prompts.
   
Journal entries document changes you plan to make when you implement the project a second time.
3 = Journal entries specifically document the changes you plan to make and a rationale for the change.
2 = Journal entries specifically document the changes you plan to make.
1 = Journal entries document the changes you plan to make but lack detail.
0 = Journal entries do not document the changes you plan to make.
Reflections demonstrate knowledge of engaged learning through examples and/or anecdotes.
3 = Reflections include anecdotes or examples that demonstrate the indicators of engaged learning in the project.
2 = Reflections include anecdotes or examples that mention the indicators of engaged learning but do not provide examples of them within the project.
0 = Reflections do not include the indicators of engaged learning.
 
Reflections demonstrate knowledge of best use of technology through examples and/or anecdotes.
3 = Reflections include anecdotes or examples that demonstrate the indicators of best use of technology in the project.
2 = Reflections include anecdotes or examples that mention the indicators of best use of technology, but do not provide examples of them within the project.
0 = Reflections do not include the indicators of best use of technology.
 

Comments:

Created for the Fermilab LInC program sponsored by Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Education Office and Fermilab Friends for Science Education, and funded by United States Department of Energy, Illinois State Board of Education, North Central Regional Technology in Education Consortium which is operated by North Central Regional Educational Laboratory (NCREL), and the National Science Foundation.

Authors: LInC ACT 2005 Class
Created: October 2005 - Updated: Decmeber 2005
URL: http://ed.fnal.gov/lincon/act/rubrics/journal.shtml