| |
Criteria |
| 4 |
- engaging, creative, and thoughtful
- precise, vivid, and sophisticated vocabulary; varied patterns and
lengths of sentences
- coherent and organized structure
- chosen form effectively and innovatively conveys content
- relevant and intriguing use of details to convey personality and
experience of person interviewed
- few surface feature errors; only noticeable if looking for
them
|
| 3 |
- clear and thoughtful
- complex, precise vocabulary and varied sentences
- logical organization
- chosen form effectively conveys content
- relevant and careful use of details to convey personality and
experience of person interviewed
- few surface feature errors; occasional spelling or punctuation
errors
|
| 2 |
- quite well developed and detailed
- generally precise vocabulary and complex sentence structures
containing minimal errors
- obvious organization
- chosen form appropriate for content
- relevant use of details to convey personality and experience of
person interviewed
- generally few surface feature errors; some punctuation, spelling, or
pronoun reference errors
|
| 1 |
- direct and usually clear
- straightforward vocabulary and effective sentences that are rarely
complex or varied
- organization evident
- chosen form generally appropriate for content
- competent use of details to convey personality and experience of
person interviewed
- surface feature errors such as comma splice, spelling, or pronoun
reference errors
|
| :-) |
- limited clarity and thought
- unsophisticated and, at times, inappropriate vocabulary with simple
sentences
- evidence of some organization
- chosen form rarely conveys content effectively
- inconsistent use of details to convey personality and experience of
person interviewed
- surface feature errors may at times distract reader
- message is clear, understandable, and
thought-provoking
|
