Fermilab LInC Online

The Bridges of Adams County

The Bridges of Adams County Project Assessment Forms

Experts

Carpentry Assignments

 Drafting Assignments

Resources

 Summary
Scenario-1  Scenario-2 Student Pages

 Staff Development
 Index of Projects

Student Name:_________________________

Date:___________

This form is to be used for evaluating a student's achievement in the bridge building project.

Bridge Building Project Ratings

 Superior 5 pts.

 Excellent 4 pts.

 Acceptable 3 pts.

 Poor 2 pts.

 Unacceptable 0 pts.

 Fulfillment of project criteria
          

 Evidence of originality
          

 Thought and creativity
          

 Thoroughness of research
          

 Ability to work cooperatively
          

 Attention to detail and accuracy
          

 Consistency of purpose
          

 Timely in attendance and in task completion
          

 Science knowledge gained
          

 Historical knowledge of bridges gained
          

 Effective use of technology
          

Back to Top

Teacher Name:______________________

Date:______________

Teacher Assessment of Writing

Writer:______________________________ Title:____________________________

This Page is to evaluate students' writing assignments, using the following ratings:

5 = superior; 4 = Excellent; 3 = Acceptable; 2 = Poor; 1 = Unacceptable

 Introduction

 Rating

 Comments
Statement of goal    
Recognition of audience    

Content
    
Appropriateness of title    
Accuracy of material    
Thoroughness of material  
Adequate sources (at least three)    
Validity of conclusion    

Organization
    
Orderliness and logic of presentation    
Relevance of supporting ideas to main area    
Continuity of ideas and subtopics    

Grammar and Style
    
Clarity of sentences and paragraphs    
Variety in sentence length and structure    
Overall quality of prose    
Correctness of Capitalization, punctuation and spelling    

Back to Top

Student Assessment of Writing

Writer:______________________________ Title:____________________________

This Page is to evaluate students' writing assignments, using the following ratings:

5 = superior; 4 = Excellent; 3 = Acceptable; 2 = Poor; 1 = Unacceptable

 Introduction

 Rating

 Comments
Statement of goal    
Recognition of audience    

Content
    
Appropriateness of title    
Accuracy of material    
Thoroughness of material  
Adequate sources (at least three)    
Validity of conclusion    

Organization
    
Orderliness and logic of presentation    
Relevance of supporting ideas to main area    
Continuity of ideas and subtopics    

Grammar and Style
    
Clarity of sentences and paragraphs    
Variety in sentence length and structure    
Overall quality of prose    
Correctness of Capitalization, punctuation and spelling    

Back to Top

Cooperative Learning Assessment Teacher Form

 Individual Assessment

 Name:________________

Activity ______________

Specific role assigned to student within the group

  Superior  Excellent  Acceptable  Poor  Unacceptable
 Student's effectiveness in this role          
 Quality of student's expression          
Quality of student's interaction with group members          

 Comments: ___________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

 Group Assessment

 Group Members ____________ ____________

____________ ____________

  Always

 Often
  Sometime  Rarely  Never
The group agreed on a plan.          
 All participated in the activity.          
Time was use productively.          
 Opinions of all members were respected.          
 The group used constructive criticism.          
 Members showed strong leadership          

 Comments: ___________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

Back to Top

Cooperative Learning Assessment Student Form

 Individual Assessment

 Name:________________

Activity ______________

Specific role assigned to student within the group

  Superior  Excellent  Acceptable  Poor  Unacceptable
 Student's effectiveness in this role          
 Quality of student's expression          
Quality of student's interaction with group members          

 Comments: ___________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

 Group Assessment

 Group Members ____________ ____________

____________ ____________

  Always

 Often
  Sometime  Rarely  Never
The group agreed on a plan.          
 All participated in the activity.          
Time was use productively.          
 Opinions of all members were respected.          
 The group used constructive criticism.          
 Members showed strong leadership          

 Comments: ___________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

 

Back to Top

 

Created for the Fermilab LInC program sponsored by Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Education Office, Friends of Fermilab, United States Department of Energy, Illinois State Board of Education, and North Central Regional Technology in Education Consortium (NCRTEC) which is operated by North Central Regional Educational Laboratory (NCREL).

 

Author(s):Randall C. Dunkin rdunkin@bright.net
Richard T. Kuhn rickk@bright.net
School: Ohio Valley Vocational School, West Union, Ohio 45693
Created: May 15,1998 - Updated: May 22, 1998
URL: /lincon/w98/projects/bridges/rubric.html